<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Public Address / Karajoz Great Blend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the-monkey.net/2007/02/12/public-address-karajoz-great-blend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the-monkey.net/2007/02/12/public-address-karajoz-great-blend/</link>
	<description>yeh, yeah, nah</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 04:04:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.the-monkey.net/2007/02/12/public-address-karajoz-great-blend/comment-page-1/#comment-2032</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 01:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-monkey.net/2007/02/12/public-address-karajoz-great-blend/#comment-2032</guid>
		<description>She was annoying to me because of the things she did get to say.  1. Saying that Rob didn\&#039;t like the site because he didn\&#039;t like change.  (I don\&#039;t know anyone who likes the new site.  Everyone seems to agree that it needed to be updated, but what they\&#039;ve got isn\&#039;t what anyone I\&#039;ve spoken to wanted.)  2.  The stuff about moderation I\&#039;ve already gone on about endlessly.  3.  To a lesser extent, pretending that there aren\&#039;t already functional premium content models that they can just straight up rip off.  Like I said in my post, there should have been two panels.  But the one with people like Rob on it?  That would have been the really interesting one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She was annoying to me because of the things she did get to say.  1. Saying that Rob didn\&#8217;t like the site because he didn\&#8217;t like change.  (I don\&#8217;t know anyone who likes the new site.  Everyone seems to agree that it needed to be updated, but what they\&#8217;ve got isn\&#8217;t what anyone I\&#8217;ve spoken to wanted.)  2.  The stuff about moderation I\&#8217;ve already gone on about endlessly.  3.  To a lesser extent, pretending that there aren\&#8217;t already functional premium content models that they can just straight up rip off.  Like I said in my post, there should have been two panels.  But the one with people like Rob on it?  That would have been the really interesting one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.the-monkey.net/2007/02/12/public-address-karajoz-great-blend/comment-page-1/#comment-2031</link>
		<dc:creator>amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-monkey.net/2007/02/12/public-address-karajoz-great-blend/#comment-2031</guid>
		<description>I totally disagree - I don&#039;t think that Kristine was given a non-confrontational way to speak, with the dude from Theyworkforyou giving his personal opinions and even panel-jacking!  He shouldn&#039;t have been on there if you&#039;re going to remove anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally disagree &#8211; I don&#8217;t think that Kristine was given a non-confrontational way to speak, with the dude from Theyworkforyou giving his personal opinions and even panel-jacking!  He shouldn&#8217;t have been on there if you&#8217;re going to remove anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
